The Cognitive Crescendo: Decoding the Neuroscience & Sociology of Viral Musical Hooks

Introduction

The human experience is saturated with music, yet within this vast auditory landscape, certain moments possess an uncanny power. A short melodic phrase, a unique rhythmic pattern, or a single lyrical line can detach from its parent song, embed itself in the collective consciousness, and propagate through cultures with the speed and tenacity of a contagion. These phenomena, known colloquially as “hooks,” represent more than just clever songwriting; they are potent neurological and social artifacts. The central inquiry of this report is to dissect this power: Why do our brains not only remember but actively crave certain musical moments? What are the precise mechanisms that transform a sequence of sounds into a memorable, desirable, and ultimately “viral” entity?

With Beatsnap, artists can instantly discover which emerging beats are gaining traction—letting you tap into trending sounds before they blow up and ride the algorithm’s wave and transform your music into social media gold with Instant Video Clips For Your Music.

This analysis posits that a viral hook is not a static object but a dynamic, multi-stage process. The journey begins with specific, identifiable structural features within the music itself—patterns of repetition, rhythm, and melody meticulously crafted, whether by intuition or design, to engage the brain’s fundamental processing architecture. These features are then decoded by a hierarchical network of neural systems, from the initial sensory analysis in the auditory cortex to higher-order cognitive evaluation in the prefrontal cortex and emotional coloring in the limbic system. The true “craving,” however, emerges from a deeper mechanism: the brain’s intrinsic function as a prediction engine. The pleasure and memorability of a hook are products of a delicate dance between expectation and surprise, a process that culminates in a powerful neurochemical reward, primarily mediated by dopamine. This individual neurological event provides the fuel for memory and the motivation for repetition. Finally, this individual response is amplified through the complex dynamics of social networks, where mechanisms of peer influence and algorithmic feedback can launch a neurologically potent hook into the stratosphere of cultural virality.

To unravel this phenomenon, this report will proceed in four parts. Part I will deconstruct the musicological architecture of the hook and map the brain’s intricate system for processing it. Part II will delve into the core neurochemistry of craving and compulsion, exploring the roles of prediction, dopamine, and the peculiar persistence of “earworms.” Part III will scale the analysis from the individual brain to the collective, examining models of social contagion and the evolutionary origins of our musicality. Finally, Part IV will place these findings in a broader context, comparing musical reward to other pleasures like food and social media, and exploring the practical applications of this knowledge in fields from clinical therapy to global commerce.

Part I: The Architecture of Auditory Allure

Deconstructing the Hook: A Musicological and Psychological Primer

The term “hook” is a functional descriptor before it is a formal musicological one; its defining characteristic is its effect—to “catch the ear of the listener” and make a song appealing and memorable. While often used synonymously with a song’s chorus, a hook is a more versatile and fundamental concept. It can be a short riff, a passage, a lyrical phrase, a specific sound, or any recurring musical idea designed to stand out and be easily remembered. Its primary purpose is to generate attention, create anticipation, and drive the commercial potential of a song by embedding it in the listener’s mind. A hook can appear anywhere in a song’s structure and a single hit song often deploys multiple, layered hooks to maximize its impact.  

The effectiveness of a hook is not accidental but is rooted in a collection of specific structural elements that exploit the brain’s pattern-recognition and memory systems. Analysis reveals several key components:

• Repetition: This is the most fundamental principle of a hook. Repetition legitimizes a musical idea, reinforcing it in the listener’s mind with each occurrence—an effect you’ll find replicated in many of our top-ranked Royalty-Free Rap Beats designed for maximum recall. The human brain is inherently wired to recognize, process, and retain patterns, and a repeated musical fragment capitalizes on this predisposition. A hook that appears only once fails its primary purpose; its power is magnified through recurrence.  
• Simplicity: To be memorable, a hook must be readily graspable, even by those without musical training. This often translates to melodic and rhythmic simplicity. Melodic hooks frequently consist of a limited number of notes, often spaced by small, easily singable intervals, which facilitates recall and encourages participation.  
• Rhythm and Syncopation: A compelling, often danceable, rhythm is a cornerstone of many powerful hooks. A particularly effective rhythmic device is syncopation—the strategic placement of notes on off-beats, which displaces the expected rhythmic pulse. This creates a sense of tension and release, making a rhythmic phrase or lyrical delivery more engaging and memorable, causing it to “pop” out from the musical texture.  
• Melodic Contour: The shape of a melody contributes significantly to its catchiness. Hooks often employ interesting melodic contours, such as large, attention-grabbing leaps between notes or a satisfying, predictable rise and fall that resolves tension. The iconic opening of Neil Diamond’s “Sweet Caroline,” with its “bum-bum-bum” and subsequent melodic arc, is a classic example of a memorable contour—much like the unforgettable choruses featured in our Iconic Hooks & Choruses in Rap & Hip-Hop roundup.  
• Lyrical Devices: Lyrics themselves can function as potent hooks. This is achieved through several means: making the lyrics emotionally evocative and relatable; using clever wordplay, such as subverting a common phrase to create novelty; or crafting lines that are simply phonetically pleasing and fun to repeat, even if they consist of non-word syllables like “da doo ron ron” or “MmmBop”.  

These elements are not deployed in isolation. The most successful songs often feature a taxonomy of different hook types, each serving a specific function within the song’s architecture. Intro hooks, like the iconic guitar riff in The Rolling Stones’ “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction,” are designed to grab the listener’s attention from the very first second.  

Rhythmic hooks, like the stomping beat of Queen’s “We Will Rock You,” offer an irresistible, corporeal foundation—and you can explore dozens of similar bumping back-to-back rhythms in our Trap Beats Collection.

Instrumental hooks, like the clavinet groove in Stevie Wonder’s “Superstition,” can form a continuous, memorable bed for the entire track.  

Vocal and lyrical hooks are perhaps the most common, providing the sing-along moments that define a chorus. Finally,  

structural hooks represent a more sophisticated approach, where unconventional song structures, like the multi-part epic of Queen’s “Bohemian Rhapsody,” create unpredictability and maintain listener engagement through large-scale formal novelty.  

A deeper analysis of these elements reveals two critical principles that govern a hook’s power. First, the most potent hooks are not single elements but rather a functional hierarchy of layered components. A song like The Champs’ “Tequila” demonstrates this principle perfectly: it layers a catchy rhythmic riff, a strong melodic saxophone hook, and a simple, spoken-word sound effect hook (“Tequila!”). Each layer provides a different entry point for the brain’s processing systems. A simple drum pattern provides a foundational rhythmic anchor, a bassline adds a memorable instrumental pattern, and a vocal melody offers the most salient, singable element. This layering creates a rich, multi-faceted stimulus that engages different neural streams simultaneously, making the overall musical moment more robustly encoded and difficult to ignore. The term “hook,” therefore, is best understood not by its mechanical form (a riff, a chorus) but by its function: its ability to capture and hold attention.  

Second, the effectiveness of a hook hinges on a delicate trade-off between novelty and familiarity. The elements of simplicity and repetition create a sense of familiarity and predictability, which is comforting and easy for the brain to process. However, pure predictability is boring. The hook must also introduce an element of the unexpected—a syncopated rhythm, a unique sound, or a clever lyrical twist that subverts the listener’s expectations. This creates a “sweet spot” where a familiar, predictable framework is violated in a small but interesting way. It is the synthesis of the “expected with the unexpected” , a form of manageable novelty that the human brain actively craves. This psychological principle of balancing predictability with surprise is the direct precursor to the neuroscientific mechanisms of reward and pleasure that will be explored in the subsequent sections of this report.  

The Listening Brain: From Sound Wave to Cerebral Symphony

The brain’s engagement with a musical hook is not a single event but a complex, multi-stage process involving a distributed network of neural regions. This process is fundamentally hierarchical, beginning with the deconstruction of raw acoustic data and culminating in a rich, integrated experience of structure, emotion, and memory. Understanding this neural architecture is essential to comprehending why hooks have such a profound effect.

The journey begins in the ear, where sound waves are transduced into electrical signals within the cochlea. These signals then travel via the auditory nerve through several processing stations in the brainstem before arriving at their primary destination in the cerebral cortex: the auditory cortex, located in the temporal lobe. Here, the initial, critical stages of musical analysis take place. The primary auditory cortex (A1) performs a fundamental frequency analysis, containing a tonotopic map where specific clusters of neurons respond to specific pitches. This area decodes the basic building blocks of music: pitch and loudness. From A1, the information flows to secondary and tertiary auditory areas, such as the planum temporale, which undertake more complex processing. These higher-order regions integrate the basic features into coherent perceptions of melody, harmony, and rhythm. There is also a degree of hemispheric specialization: the right auditory cortex appears to be particularly crucial for processing pitch and melody, while the left hemisphere is more involved in processing rhythm and the syntactic components of language, including lyrics. This entire process is hierarchical: the brain builds its understanding of music from the bottom up, assembling simple features into progressively more complex and meaningful representations.  

While the auditory cortex decodes the “what” of music, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is instrumental in understanding the “how” and “why.” As the brain’s executive control center, the PFC is crucial for processing musical structure, syntax, and rules. The lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) acts as a high-level hub, translating the abstract rules of music, such as harmonic progressions, into a coherent understanding of the sequence as it unfolds over time. It is this region that allows the brain to form expectations about what should come next in a musical phrase. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), in contrast, is more closely linked to personal significance and memory; it becomes particularly active when we hear familiar music and plays a role in linking songs to our autobiographical past. In highly creative contexts, such as jazz improvisation, specific PFC regions are modulated, with areas related to self-monitoring being suppressed while areas related to storytelling and self-expression are activated.  

The final layer of processing, which imbues music with its profound power, occurs within the limbic system, the brain’s ancient emotional and memorial core. Music is a potent activator of this network. Two structures are paramount. The amygdala acts as an emotional sentinel, evaluating the affective significance of the music and tagging it with a valence—pleasant or unpleasant, happy or sad. It is responsible for the raw feeling a hook evokes. The hippocampus works in concert with the amygdala to forge a link between this emotional response and the musical event itself, encoding it into long-term memory. This is why hearing a familiar hook can instantly transport us back in time, triggering a cascade of associated autobiographical memories and the emotions tied to them.  

The intricate, multi-layered nature of this neural processing provides a powerful explanation for the effectiveness of a well-crafted hook. The brain does not process music as a single, undifferentiated sound. Instead, it engages in a parallel and hierarchical analysis that mirrors the layered construction of the hook itself. The auditory cortex is fed a clean, discernible pattern of rhythm and pitch. Simultaneously, the prefrontal cortex is engaged by the hook’s structure, tracking its adherence to or violation of learned musical rules. At the same time, the limbic system is activated, coloring the experience with emotion and linking it to memory. A powerful hook succeeds because it provides compelling, optimized information for each of these processing streams at once. This “full-stack” neural engagement—simultaneously satisfying the brain’s pattern-recognition, rule-processing, and emotional systems—is what makes a hook so neurologically arresting.

From this, it becomes clear that “catchiness” is not a quality located in any single brain region. Rather, it is an emergent property arising from the dynamic interaction and dialogue between these distinct neural networks. A hook is not catchy simply because the auditory cortex processes its melody efficiently. It becomes catchy when that melodic representation is passed to the prefrontal cortex, which forms an expectation about its continuation, and to the limbic system, which attaches an emotion to its sound. The feeling of craving or compulsion arises from the conversation between these systems. For instance, when the prefrontal cortex detects a structural surprise—a violation of expectation—it signals the limbic and reward networks, a process that, as will be shown, can generate intense pleasure. Catchiness, therefore, is a network effect, a symphony of coordinated activity across the entire listening brain.

To provide a clear reference for this complex architecture, the following table summarizes the key brain regions and their primary functions in the perception and experience of music.

Table 1: Key Brain Regions in Music Processing

Brain Network	Key Region(s)	Primary Functions in Music Processing	Relevant Snippets
Auditory System	Auditory Cortex (Temporal Lobe), including Primary (A1), Secondary, Heschl’s Gyrus (HG)	Initial processing of sound waves. Tonotopic mapping of frequency (pitch). Hierarchical analysis of pitch, loudness, timbre, melody, and rhythm. Right hemisphere dominance for melody/pitch.
Cognitive Control Network	Prefrontal Cortex (PFC), especially Lateral (LPFC) and Medial (mPFC)	Processing musical structure, syntax, and rules. Forming expectations. Working memory for music. Decision-making and planning (in performance). mPFC links music to autobiographical memory.
Limbic System (Emotion & Memory)	Amygdala, Hippocampus, Nucleus Accumbens (NAc)	Amygdala: Processes emotional significance and valence (positive/negative) of music. Hippocampus: Encodes and retrieves long-term and autobiographical memories associated with music. NAc: Central hub for pleasure and reward (detailed in Part II).
Motor System	Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, Supplementary Motor Area (SMA)	Processing of beat, timing, and rhythm. Sensorimotor coupling (the urge to move). Motor planning and coordination for playing instruments or dancing.

Part II: The Neurochemistry of Craving and Compulsion

The Predictive Brain: Expectation, Surprise, and the Pleasure of Learning

The human brain is not a passive receiver of sensory information; it is an active, prediction-generating machine. A leading theory in modern neuroscience, the Predictive Coding (PC) framework, posits that the brain’s fundamental task is to continuously build and update an internal model of the world to anticipate future sensory inputs. The primary goal of this process is to minimize “prediction error” (PE)—the mismatch between what the brain expects to sense and what it actually senses. This predictive capacity is a vital survival mechanism, allowing for rapid and efficient responses to a dynamic environment. Music, with its intricate and evolving structures of melody, harmony, and rhythm, provides a perfect arena for this predictive system to operate. As a piece of music unfolds, the brain leverages its stored knowledge of musical conventions to form a cascade of expectations: where a melody is likely to resolve, when the next beat will land, and what chord will follow the current one.  

The pleasure derived from music is intimately tied to the accuracy and violation of these predictions. This relationship is not linear; it follows a well-documented psychological principle known as the inverted U-shaped curve, or Wundt effect. This curve suggests that pleasure is maximized not by perfect predictability, which is monotonous and uninformative, nor by complete unpredictability, which is chaotic and stressful. Instead, the peak of pleasure is found in stimuli of “intermediate complexity”. In a musical context, this means a hook is most rewarding when it presents a “manageable challenge” to the brain’s predictive model. It must be predictable enough to establish a clear expectation but surprising enough to violate that expectation in an interesting way. This process of encountering a manageable surprise and successfully updating the brain’s internal model to account for it is an intrinsically rewarding act of learning. Listeners even show a preference for more predictability during moments of high uncertainty, as this facilitates the rewarding process of reducing that uncertainty.  

This dynamic of expectation and violation is the source of one of the most powerful signals in the brain’s reward circuitry: the Reward Prediction Error (RPE). An RPE is not simply a measure of sensory surprise; it is a valenced signal that quantifies the difference between the expected reward of an event and the actual reward received. When a musical hook unfolds in a way that is pleasantly surprising—for example, resolving to an unexpected but highly consonant chord—it generates a positive RPE. It is this signal, the feeling of something being “better than expected,” that powerfully activates the brain’s pleasure centers. Neuroimaging studies have provided direct evidence for this mechanism, showing that the brain’s reward regions light up in direct correlation with formally modeled RPEs elicited by music. This demonstrates that it is not just the sound itself, but the  

surprise value of the sound, that drives pleasure and motivates the learning of musical patterns.  

This framework fundamentally reframes the nature of musical pleasure. The “craving” for a hook is not merely a desire for a pleasant sensory stimulus. It is a manifestation of a much deeper, cognitive drive: the craving for information and resolution. The brain’s primary directive, according to the PC model, is to create an accurate model of its environment by minimizing uncertainty. The process of learning—of updating one’s internal model to better predict the future—is one of the most fundamental ways to reduce uncertainty, and as such, it is profoundly rewarding and deeply integrated with the dopamine system. A hook provides a perfectly calibrated learning opportunity: a small, digestible, and ultimately resolvable violation of an established pattern. The pleasure we derive from it is, in essence, the pleasure of solving the cognitive puzzle it presents. The RPE signal is the brain’s neurochemical confirmation that it has successfully learned something new and useful about the musical structure. Therefore, the desire to hear a hook again is a form of information-seeking behavior, an active cognitive process of engaging with and resolving manageable uncertainty, disguised as passive aesthetic enjoyment.  

A crucial distinction within this model is the one between Prediction Error (PE) and Reward Prediction Error (RPE). A PE is a neutral signal, generated in sensory and cognitive areas like the auditory and prefrontal cortices, that simply registers a mismatch between a predicted and an actual sensory event (e.g., “I expected to hear a C, but I heard a D”). An RPE, in contrast, is a valenced signal calculated in the brain’s reward centers that registers a mismatch in expected  

value (e.g., “I expected this to be pleasant, but it was surprisingly delightful”). The pleasure of a hook appears to emerge from a two-step process where a structural PE (a surprising note) triggers a positive RPE (it sounds better than expected). This explains why not all surprises are pleasurable. A dissonant, jarring note also creates a large PE, but it leads to a  

negative RPE, which is processed as unpleasant. Only those surprises that are perceived as “structurally good” or that lead to a beneficial update of our internal model become rewarding. In this more nuanced view, dopamine may not simply encode the reward itself, but rather the “precision” or “salience” of the prediction error, effectively flagging it as a particularly important piece of information to be learned from and remembered.  

The Dopamine Loop: The Neurological Basis of Musical Reward

The neurochemical core of musical pleasure and the craving for hooks lies within the brain’s reward system, a network of structures responsible for motivation, reinforcement learning, and hedonic experience. At the heart of this system is the nucleus accumbens (NAc), a region within the ventral striatum that serves as a central hub for processing reward. A wealth of neuroimaging research has demonstrated that the level of activity in the NAc is one of the most reliable predictors of a listener’s subjective enjoyment of music; the more pleasure a person reports, the more active their NAc becomes.  

The key that unlocks this pleasure circuit is the neurotransmitter dopamine. Listening to music that one finds pleasurable triggers a release of dopamine into the striatum. For a long time, this was understood as a correlation, but recent pharmacological studies have established a direct  

causal link. Experiments in which dopamine levels were artificially enhanced (with a precursor like levodopa) or inhibited (with a blocker like risperidone) showed corresponding increases and decreases in reported musical pleasure. This provides definitive evidence that dopamine is not merely associated with but actively mediates the rewarding experience of music.  

Furthermore, the reward process can be dissociated into two distinct phases, each with its own neurochemical signature. The first phase is anticipation, or “wanting.” This is the sense of craving or motivation that builds as we approach a highly anticipated musical moment, such as the drop in a dance track or the soaring chorus of a power ballad. This anticipatory phase is associated with dopamine release in the dorsal striatum, specifically the caudate nucleus. The second phase is consummation, or “liking.” This is the peak hedonic experience itself, the moment of intense pleasure often accompanied by physical sensations like “chills” or “frisson.” This consummatory phase is linked to dopamine release in the  

ventral striatum, specifically the nucleus accumbens. This anatomical and temporal distinction between “wanting” and “liking” circuits is not unique to music; it mirrors the brain’s response to primary biological rewards like food and even addictive drugs, highlighting the fundamental nature of this reward pathway.  

This system creates a powerful neurochemical feedback loop that explains the compulsive and “addictive” quality of a great hook. The process unfolds as follows: a hook provides a pleasantly surprising musical event, generating a positive Reward Prediction Error. This signal triggers the consummatory (“liking”) circuit, causing dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens, which we experience as pleasure. The hippocampus then works to encode this highly salient, pleasurable event into long-term memory. This memory, now tagged with strong positive emotion, fuels the anticipatory (“wanting”) circuit. The brain now craves to re-experience the stimulus to get another hit of dopamine, motivating the listener to seek out the song again. Each repetition strengthens this loop, embedding the hook more deeply in memory and reinforcing the craving to hear it again.  

It is crucial, however, to contextualize the “addictive” nature of music. While a hook engages the same core mesolimbic dopamine pathway (from the ventral tegmental area, or VTA, to the NAc) as do substances of abuse, the mechanism and consequences are fundamentally different. Addictive drugs typically operate by hijacking this system, causing a massive, non-physiological flood of dopamine that the brain is not equipped to handle. This leads to maladaptive neurochemical changes, such as the downregulation of dopamine receptors and increased oxidative stress, which underlie tolerance and withdrawal. Music, in contrast, triggers dopamine release through “normal physiological mechanisms” that are intrinsically linked to cognitive engagement—the processes of prediction and surprise. The magnitude of dopamine released by listening to an enjoyable song is orders of magnitude less than that released by a potent stimulant. Consequently, while music can be intensely craved and sought out, it does not typically cause the harmful neuroadaptive changes associated with pathological addiction. Music  

utilizes the brain’s reward pathway as it was intended—to reinforce learning and adaptive behavior. It does not, in the way a drug does, overwhelm and break it. This provides a critical, nuanced distinction to the often-sensationalized “music is a drug” analogy.

The Cognitive Itch: The Neuroscience of the Earworm

The most compelling evidence for a hook’s power to colonize the mind is the phenomenon of the “earworm,” or Involuntary Musical Imagery (INMI). This is the common, often maddening, experience of a fragment of a song becoming “stuck” in one’s head, repeating uncontrollably on a loop for hours or even days. Far from being a simple memory recall, the earworm is a complex cognitive event that emerges from the interplay of the brain’s auditory, memory, and attentional networks. Scientists have described it as a “cognitive itch”—an unresolved mental pattern that the brain compulsively replays.  

The neural seat of the earworm is, unsurprisingly, the auditory cortex—so if you’re trying to stick a fresh riff in your head (or someone else’s), check out our curated list of 100 Viral Rap Hooks You Can Use for instant inspiration. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that the very same regions of the auditory cortex that are active when a person is physically listening to a song are reactivated when they are merely imagining it. This suggests that the earworm is, in effect, the brain’s own internal MP3 player replaying a stored memory trace. This replay mechanism is thought to involve the phonological loop, a component of verbal short-term memory located in the frontal lobe, which acts like a short, continuous tape recording. While most auditory information is either consolidated into long-term memory or forgotten, the catchy, repetitive nature of a hook seems to allow it to persist abnormally long in this short-term loop.  

The triggering of an earworm is often linked to the brain’s attentional state. INMI episodes share significant neural overlap with other forms of spontaneous, self-generated thought, such as mind-wandering or daydreaming. These states are governed by the Default Mode Network (DMN), a collection of brain regions that becomes active when our attention is not directed toward an external, goal-oriented task. It appears that when the brain enters this “idle” state, it becomes more susceptible to the intrusion of these potent musical memories. Indeed, studies have found that individuals with reduced cortical thickness in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a key hub of the DMN, tend to experience more frequent and longer-lasting earworms.  

The emotional and memorial content of the song also plays a critical role. The parahippocampal cortex (PHC), a region vital for the retrieval of episodic memories, is heavily implicated. Individuals with greater gray matter volume in the PHC, particularly those who tend to experience strong positive emotions from music, are more prone to earworms. This suggests that the PHC facilitates the retrieval of the memory and its associated emotions, which then gets “stuck” in the replay loop. This aligns with a prominent psychological theory for earworms: the Zeigarnik effect. This principle states that the human brain has a greater tendency to remember incomplete or interrupted tasks than completed ones. A musical hook, which is by definition a fragment of a larger piece, may act as an “incomplete task” for the brain. The DMN’s replay of the hook could be an unconscious attempt to find the rest of the song and achieve cognitive closure, thus scratching the “cognitive itch”.  

Finally, individual differences in brain structure can predict susceptibility. In addition to the DMN and PHC variations, people with greater cortical thickness in the right Heschl’s gyrus (a part of the primary auditory cortex) and the right inferior frontal gyrus (involved in pitch memory) report experiencing earworms more frequently. This is consistent with reports that professional musicians and individuals who consider music a central part of their lives are more prone to the phenomenon.  

An earworm is therefore not just a passive memory. It is an active cognitive process occurring at a dynamic intersection of neural systems. The process begins with a highly salient memory trace of a hook, stored in the auditory cortex. This trace is involuntarily triggered, often when the brain’s executive control network relaxes and the Default Mode Network takes over. The hook’s fragmented or unresolved structure then acts as a cognitive irritant, prompting the brain to repeatedly engage its memory retrieval (PHC) and auditory replay (auditory cortex) systems in a looping attempt to find resolution. The emotional valence of the memory further strengthens its salience, making it more difficult for the brain’s inhibitory systems to suppress. This integrated model explains why consciously trying to stop an earworm often backfires; the act of focusing on it can paradoxically increase its neural salience and prolong its persistence.  

Part III: From Individual Brain to Global Phenomenon

The Contagion Model: Why Music Goes “Viral”

The journey of a hook from a private mental loop to a global cultural phenomenon requires a shift in scale, from the neurobiology of the individual to the sociology of the collective. The very language used to describe immense popularity—”viral,” “infectious,” “contagious”—is more than mere metaphor. Recent research demonstrates that the spread of a popular song through a population can be accurately modeled using the same mathematical frameworks developed in epidemiology to track the spread of infectious diseases.  

The most common of these is the Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) model, which provides a powerful analogy for music virality. In this framework, the population is divided into three compartments :  

• Susceptible (S): Individuals who have not yet heard the song but are potential listeners.
• Infectious (I): Individuals who are currently listening to the song and actively “spreading” it through word-of-mouth, social media sharing, or other forms of social influence.
• Recovered (R): Individuals who have moved on from the song, are no longer actively listening to it, and are thus no longer “infectious.”

This model allows for the calculation of key epidemiological parameters that have direct analogues in music popularity. The most important of these is the basic reproduction number (R0​), which in this context measures the average number of new listeners an “infectious” person will convert in a fully susceptible population. A song with a high  

R0​ will spread explosively, while a song with an R0​ below 1 will fail to gain traction. Analysis of massive song download datasets has shown that the SIR model fits the rise-and-fall trajectory of hit songs remarkably well, suggesting that the underlying social dynamics are indeed similar to those of a contagion.  

This “virality” is not a purely organic, bottom-up process. While initial sharing among friends can plant the seed, the trajectory from a minor spark to a global wildfire is driven by specific mechanisms of social contagion. These include:  

• Peer Influence: Musical tastes and listening habits are known to spread through social networks. Studies have shown, for example, that attendance at a live music event can “infect” the attendee’s friends, measurably increasing their streaming of that artist’s music.  
• Influencer Amplification: A crucial step in achieving mass virality is amplification by highly connected nodes in the network—influencers, established creators, or media outlets. A share from such a source acts as a “super-spreader” event, instantly seeding the song into a large, receptive audience and providing the initial velocity needed to capture the attention of platform algorithms.  
• Algorithmic Feedback Loops: Modern platforms—TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram—act as powerful engines of musical virality; for artists looking to ride that wave, our AI-Powered Playlist Intelligence Tool can help you identify which hooks are primed for algorithmic success. Their algorithms are designed to detect and promote content that shows strong early engagement signals, such as high watch time, rapid sharing, and high comment volume. Once a hook starts to gain traction, the algorithm amplifies its reach, creating a self-reinforcing feedback loop of visibility and spread.  
• Emotional Core and Participation: Songs are more likely to be shared if they tap into strong, universal emotions—humor, inspiration, shock, validation—and if they make it easy for users to participate, for example, through remixes, dance challenges, or by using the sound in their own content.  

This analysis leads to a critical conclusion: the neurobiology of the hook is the necessary but not sufficient condition for virality. The social network structure acts as the critical amplifier that determines a hook’s ultimate reach. The neurological mechanisms detailed in Part II explain why an individual finds a song pleasurable, memorable, and worthy of repetition. However, the contagion models show that songs with hooks of seemingly equal neurological potency can have vastly different spreading dynamics. For instance, analysis shows that songs in the Electronica genre often have a much higher R0​ than songs in the Pop genre, leading to faster, more explosive “epidemics” of popularity. The proposed reason is not that Electronica hooks are intrinsically “better,” but that the social network of Electronica fans may be more tightly-knit, more passionate, and more efficient at person-to-person transmission. Pop music, in contrast, may rely more on passive, broadcast-style transmission from mass media like radio. Therefore, a song’s ultimate virality is a product of its intrinsic neurological appeal  

multiplied by the transmission efficiency of the social network it inhabits. A neurologically perfect hook released into a disconnected or unreceptive network may fail to spread, while a moderately effective hook that is strategically amplified by influencers within a highly connected network can become a global phenomenon.

The Evolutionary Echo: Primordial Roots of Musicality

To fully understand the modern brain’s profound and often involuntary response to a musical hook, it is necessary to consider the evolutionary pressures that may have shaped our capacity for music in the first place. The question of music’s origin is a subject of vigorous debate, centering on whether it is a specific adaptation that conferred a survival advantage, or an exaptation—a byproduct of other evolved traits, famously described by psychologist Steven Pinker as “auditory cheesecake”. While a definitive answer remains elusive, several compelling hypotheses offer insight into why music resonates so deeply with our neural architecture.  

Leading evolutionary theories suggest that primordial music served critical functions long before it became a form of entertainment:

• Sexual Selection: This hypothesis, first proposed by Charles Darwin, posits that musical ability, like the elaborate plumage of a peacock, evolved as a fitness indicator for mate choice. The ability to produce complex and controlled vocalizations or rhythmic patterns could have signaled genetic quality, cognitive ability, and health, making an individual a more attractive partner.  
• Social Bonding and Group Cohesion: Perhaps the most widely supported set of theories revolves around music’s role in fostering group solidarity. Early humans lived in small, cooperative groups where survival depended on coordinated action. Rhythmic music and dance would have been a powerful tool for synchronizing group movement, essential for activities like coordinated hunting, defense, or migration. This idea is supported by the   bipedalism hypothesis, which suggests that the predictable sounds of walking on two legs may have laid the evolutionary groundwork for rhythmic entrainment. A related concept is the AVID (Audio-Visual Intimidating Display) model, which proposes that loud, rhythmic group singing and drumming served as a means to intimidate predators or rival groups, signaling coalition strength and unity.  
• Mother-Infant Communication: Another powerful theory suggests that music has its roots in “motherese,” the melodic, rhythmic, and emotionally expressive vocalizations that mothers universally use when communicating with their infants. Given the extended period of human infant dependency, these musical interactions would have been crucial for establishing emotional bonds, regulating infant arousal, and facilitating language acquisition.  
• Credible Signaling: A more recent hypothesis integrates several of these ideas, proposing that music evolved as a “credible signal” of cooperative intent. In situations requiring high levels of trust and coordination, such as coalitional defense or communal child-rearing, engaging in synchronized musical activity would be a hard-to-fake signal of an individual’s commitment to the group’s goals.  

These evolutionary frameworks provide a deep context for the modern brain’s response to a musical hook. The intense pleasure derived from a hook is likely an evolutionary echo, a modern manifestation of ancient reward mechanisms that evolved to reinforce adaptive social behaviors. The brain’s reward system, driven by dopamine, is its primary tool for encouraging actions that promote survival and reproduction. If synchronized rhythm and shared vocalization were critical for group survival, natural selection would have strongly favored a neural mechanism that made engaging in these activities feel good.  

Therefore, the pleasure we feel today when a hook’s compelling rhythm engages our motor system, prompting us to tap our feet, is likely a vestige of the reward our ancestors felt when successfully synchronizing with their tribe. The profound emotional connection we feel to a hook’s melody may be an echo of the bonding facilitated by primordial mother-infant vocalizations or the shared emotional experiences of group singing. In this light, the modern musical hook can be seen as a “superstimulus”—an exaggerated, optimized signal that perfectly targets these ancient and deeply embedded social-reward circuits. Our craving for a hook is not just a quirk of modern culture; it is a resonance with the very evolutionary pressures that made us human.

Part IV: Applications and Comparative Analysis

The Brain on Different Rewards: Music, Food, and Social Media

The potent effect of a musical hook on the brain’s reward system raises a compelling comparative question: how does this abstract, aesthetic pleasure stack up against other powerful rewards, from the primary biological drive for food to the hyper-modern digital validation of social media? The answer reveals both a common neural currency of pleasure and distinct pathways that highlight the unique nature of musical reward.

All rewarding experiences, regardless of their source, converge on a common neural circuit. This network, primarily involving the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the nucleus accumbens (NAc), and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), acts as a central processing hub for pleasure and motivation. Its function is to translate diverse stimuli into a common scale of value, allowing the brain to weigh options and guide behavior—for example, to decide whether the pleasure of listening to a song is worth more than the pleasure of eating a snack at a given moment.  

Despite this shared destination, the journey to reward activation is different for each type of stimulus, resulting in distinct neural signatures:

• Music (Abstract/Cognitive Reward): The pleasure derived from music is uniquely dependent on a complex interplay between sensory and high-order cognitive brain regions. Its reward value is not innate but is learned through cultural exposure and is generated by the active cognitive process of prediction and expectation. Neuroimaging meta-analyses show that compared to a primary reward like food, musical pleasure elicits more reliable activation in phylogenetically newer, higher-order cortical regions. These include the right superior temporal gyrus (STG) and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), which are critical for processing musical syntax and structure, and the anterior prefrontal cortex, involved in coordinating complex cognitive operations. Within the core reward system, music also shows a tendency to more strongly activate the right ventromedial striatum.  
• Food (Primary/Biological Reward): The pleasure of food is more directly tied to the satisfaction of innate biological drives for energy and survival. While it activates the common reward hub, it also more strongly engages brain regions associated with direct sensory and homeostatic processing. Compared to music, food reward produces more reliable activation in the left anterior insula, which houses the primary taste cortex; the bilateral putamen, which is linked to somatosensory input; and the right amygdala, which processes the raw emotional salience and intensity of stimuli.  
• Social Media (Unpredictable/Social Reward): Social media represents a uniquely modern and potent reward source that hijacks our deeply ingrained evolutionary drive for social connection. Its power and addictive potential stem from two key factors. First is its delivery mechanism: the smartphone provides constant, immediate access, acting as a “digital hypodermic needle” for dopamine. Second, and more importantly, is its reliance on   variable-ratio reinforcement schedules. Like a slot machine, the rewards (likes, comments, notifications) are delivered unpredictably. This unpredictability is a powerful driver of Reward Prediction Errors and dopamine release, making the behavior of checking for validation highly compulsive. This system can lead to a chronic dopamine-deficit state, where the brain downregulates its own dopamine production in response to the constant overstimulation, leading to feelings of anxiety and depression when not engaged with the platform.  

This comparative analysis reveals that music occupies a unique space in the landscape of human reward. It is neither a purely biological imperative like food, nor a digitally engineered system of unpredictable validation like social media. The pleasure derived from a musical hook is cognitively demanding; it must be earned through the brain’s active engagement in pattern recognition and predictive processing. This reliance on higher-order cortical functions makes musical pleasure a uniquely sophisticated and quintessentially human experience. While the pleasure of a social media “like” is often passively received from an external, engineered system, the pleasure of a hook is actively generated by the listener’s own internal cognitive work.

To crystallize these distinctions, the following table provides a comparative summary of the neural and mechanistic differences between these three major reward types.

Table 2: Comparative Neural Activation for Different Reward Types

Feature	Music Reward	Food Reward	Social Media Reward
Reward Type	Abstract, Aesthetic, Cognitive	Primary, Biological, Homeostatic	Digital, Social, Unpredictable
Primary Driver	Predictive Coding (Expectation, Surprise, Uncertainty Reduction)	Satiation of Innate Biological Drives (Hunger, Hedonic Taste)	Unpredictable Social Validation (Likes, Comments, Shares)
Common Neural Hub	Ventral Striatum (NAc), vmPFC, Insula	Ventral Striatum (NAc), vmPFC, Insula	Ventral Striatum (NAc), vmPFC
Distinct Neural Activations	Stronger: Right STG, Right IFG, Anterior PFC (higher-order cognition, musical syntax, prediction).	Stronger: Left Insula (gustatory cortex), Bilateral Putamen (somatosensory), Right Amygdala (salience).	Stronger: Regions involved in social cognition (e.g., mPFC evaluating social rank/feedback), visual cortex.
Nature of Dopamine Response	Causal role in pleasure. Linked to anticipation (caudate) and consummation (NAc). Driven by cognitive RPEs.	Linked to motivation (‘wanting’) and hedonic experience (‘liking’). Driven by biological need and sensory input.	Large, rapid dopamine release triggered by variable reward schedules. High potential for creating dopamine-deficit state.
Relevant Snippets

Harnessing the Hook: Applications in Therapy and Commerce

The profound and predictable effects of musical hooks on the human brain have not gone unnoticed. The principles of rhythmic entrainment, emotional engagement, and memory enhancement are now being systematically applied in fields as diverse as clinical neurorehabilitation and global marketing. These applications, while serving different ends, are two sides of the same neurobiological coin: both exploit the hook’s remarkable ability to act as an external organizing principle for internal neural processes.

Neurologic Music Therapy (NMT) is a rapidly growing, evidence-based field that uses music as a tool to treat non-musical goals in patients with neurological disorders such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, traumatic brain injury, and dementia. The therapy is grounded in the understanding that music activates a wide array of cognitive, motor, and speech centers in the brain, often accessing shared or parallel neural systems that can be leveraged to retrain damaged functions.  

• Motor Rehabilitation: For patients with motor impairments, the rhythmic component of a hook is paramount. The principle of auditory-motor entrainment is used to improve gait, balance, and coordination. A strong, predictable beat from a musical piece can provide an external temporal cue that helps the brain’s damaged motor planning circuits to organize and execute movements more effectively, for instance, helping a Parkinson’s patient to walk with a more stable rhythm.  
• Speech and Language Rehabilitation: NMT leverages the significant overlap in the neural pathways for singing and speaking. For patients with expressive aphasia (difficulty producing speech), techniques like Melodic Intonation Therapy use simple, hook-like melodic phrases to facilitate vocalization. The melody and rhythm provide a scaffold that helps the brain access alternative pathways for speech production, bypassing the damaged language centers.  
• Cognitive Rehabilitation: For patients with deficits in attention, memory, or executive function, the inherent structure of music can be a powerful therapeutic tool. The predictable patterns in a simple song can help to focus attention, while the strong link between music and the hippocampus can be used to facilitate memory recall and organization of thought.  

Neuromarketing applies neuroscience techniques to understand and influence consumer behavior, and music is one of its most potent tools. Advertisers strategically deploy musical hooks to forge a powerful, often subconscious, link between a brand and a desired emotional state.  

• Driving Emotional Engagement: Research using biometrics like galvanic skin response (GSR) and facial expression analysis shows that advertisements with music generate significantly higher levels of emotional arousal, enjoyment, and engagement compared to silent versions. This heightened emotional state makes the advertising message more salient and memorable.  
• Enhancing Brand Recall and Association: A catchy jingle or a well-placed hook functions as a powerful mnemonic device. Through associative conditioning, the pleasure and emotion evoked by the music become directly linked to the brand or product. This not only enhances brand recall but can also transmit specific values; for example, fast, powerful music can cause viewers to associate the attribute of “power” with the advertised product. The hook acts as an emotional and memorial scaffold for the marketing message.  

In both NMT and neuromarketing, the hook is far more than just background noise. It is an active signal that imposes its structure onto the brain’s own internal firing patterns. In therapy, the hook’s rhythm provides an external structure for disordered motor output. In marketing, the hook’s melody and emotional valence provide a structure for the consumer’s emotional response and memory encoding. This reveals a deep, unifying principle of music’s power: its ability to entrain and organize our own neural activity, whether to heal a damaged brain or to build a global brand.

Conclusion and Future Directions

This report has charted the remarkable journey of the viral musical hook, tracing its path from a specific pattern of sound to a complex neurochemical event, and finally to a socially contagious cultural artifact. The analysis reveals that the captivating power of a hook is not a simple matter of a “catchy tune.” Instead, it is the result of a sophisticated, multi-layered process that engages the most fundamental aspects of human cognition, emotion, and social behavior.

The process begins with the hook’s architecture—a carefully calibrated blend of repetition, simplicity, and rhythmic and melodic novelty that is optimized to engage the brain’s hierarchical processing systems. As this signal is decoded, it is passed from the sensory cortices to the prefrontal cortex, where the brain’s role as a prediction engine takes center stage. The pleasure and craving we feel are not merely a response to the sound itself, but a neurochemical reward for the cognitive act of learning. The brain anticipates the musical future, and when a hook violates that expectation in a pleasant and manageable way, it generates a Reward Prediction Error, triggering a release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. This powerful feedback loop reinforces the memory of the hook, creates the compulsion to hear it again, and explains its peculiar persistence as an “earworm” in our minds.

This individual neurological event is the seed of virality, but its spread is governed by the principles of social contagion. Amplified by peer influence and algorithmic feedback loops, a neurologically potent hook can propagate through social networks with the speed of an epidemic. This entire phenomenon is rooted in our evolutionary history, where the capacity for musical engagement likely evolved to serve critical functions of social bonding, communication, and group cohesion. The modern hook, therefore, can be understood as a superstimulus, expertly tailored to activate these ancient and deeply embedded social-reward circuits. Finally, a comparative analysis shows that musical reward is a unique and cognitively demanding form of pleasure, distinct from both primary biological rewards and engineered digital ones, a fact that underlies its successful application in both clinical therapy and commercial marketing.

In synthesis, the human craving for a musical hook is not a triviality or a mere cultural quirk. It is a profound window into the fundamental workings of the human brain—its ceaseless drive to predict and model its environment, its intrinsic reward for the act of learning, its deep-seated need for emotional resonance and memory, and its evolutionary heritage as a fundamentally social creature.

Despite these significant advances in our understanding, several fascinating questions remain, pointing toward promising avenues for future research.

• Refining Predictive Models: While the Predictive Coding framework provides a powerful explanatory model, future work could focus on developing more sophisticated computational models that can predict the “hookiness” or viral potential of a piece of music with greater accuracy, integrating musical feature analysis with models of social network dynamics.
• Individual Differences: Research into conditions like musical anhedonia—the specific inability to derive pleasure from music despite normal responses to other rewards—offers a unique opportunity to further probe the specific neural pathways of musical pleasure. Understanding what is different in the brains of these individuals could provide invaluable insight into the precise nature of the auditory-reward connection.  
• Therapeutic Precision: As our understanding of music’s effect on the brain grows, so does the potential for more precise therapeutic interventions. Future research could explore the development of individually tailored musical stimuli designed to target specific neural circuits for the treatment of a wider range of neurological and psychiatric conditions, such as depression, anxiety, and autism spectrum disorder.  
• The Nuances of Dopaminergic Function: The precise role of dopamine in abstract rewards continues to be a subject of debate. Further research is needed to disentangle its function in motivation (“wanting”), hedonic pleasure (“liking”), and the encoding of prediction error salience, particularly in complex cognitive domains like music.  

The study of the viral hook is, in essence, the study of how patterns, predictions, and pleasure conspire to shape human consciousness and culture. As the tools of neuroscience become ever more powerful, they promise to reveal even deeper secrets hidden within the simple, irresistible melodies that form the soundtrack of our lives.

References

1. Hook (music) – Wikipedia, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hook_(music)
2. How to Write Musical Hooks for Your Songs | Green Hills Guitar Studio, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://greenhillsguitarstudio.com/how-to-write-musical-hooks-for-your-songs/
3. Exploring a Deeper Definition of a Song Hook | The Essential Secrets of Songwriting, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.secretsofsongwriting.com/2016/03/16/exploring-a-deeper-definition-of-a-song-hook/
4. What Is A Hook In A Song | The Hook In Music | Мusic Gateway, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.musicgateway.com/blog/music-theory/what-is-a-hook-in-a-song-and-how-do-you-write-one
5. Song Hooks: What Are They and How Do You Create Your Own? – Hooktheory, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.hooktheory.com/blog/what-is-a-hook-in-a-song/
6. How would you explain the difference between a melody and a hook in a song? – Reddit, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/musictheory/comments/s1j6pd/how_would_you_explain_the_difference_between_a/
7. How do you define a hook? : r/Songwriting – Reddit, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Songwriting/comments/1k95edb/how_do_you_define_a_hook/
8. Hooks in Music: What They Are & Why They Matter – Music Pandit, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.musicpandit.com/resources/articles/hooks/
9. This is your brain on music. This is a collaborative post with my… | by Julie P. Jones, PhD, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@JuliePJones/this-is-your-brain-on-music-0843a0586a58
10. Catchy Music | The Science Behind It – The Mystic Keys, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://themystickeys.com/why-do-some-songs-get-stuck-in-your-head-catchy-music-science/
11. What Is a Hook in a Song and How to Write One – Icon Collective, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.iconcollective.edu/what-is-a-hook-in-a-song
12. Hook vs Chorus: Pop song examples to explain the difference? : r/WeAreTheMusicMakers – Reddit, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WeAreTheMusicMakers/comments/n808kn/hook_vs_chorus_pop_song_examples_to_explain_the/
13. Why are multiple areas of the brain activated when we listen to music? – Quora, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.quora.com/Why-are-multiple-areas-of-the-brain-activated-when-we-listen-to-music
14. The transformative power of music: Insights into neuroplasticity, health, and disease – PMC, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10765015/
15. Neuroscience of music – Wikipedia, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_music
16. Cognitive Crescendo: How Music Shapes the Brain’s Structure and Function – PMC, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10605363/
17. Function and Association of Auditory Cortex with Brain, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.longdom.org/open-access/function-and-association-of-auditory-cortex-with-brain-99342.html
18. The Ultimate Guide to Auditory Cortex – Number Analytics, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-auditory-cortex-music
19. Auditory cortex – Wikipedia, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auditory_cortex
20. Brain-Based Research on the Positive Impact of Music on Individuals – PlayCore, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.playcore.com/news/brain-based-research-on-the-positive-impact-of-music-on-individuals
21. Hierarchical Representations in the Auditory Cortex – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3223290/
22. Hierarchical processing in music, language, and action: Lashley revisited – ResearchGate, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261330227_Hierarchical_processing_in_music_language_and_action_Lashley_revisited
23. The neural processing of hierarchical structure in music and speech at different timescales, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277354687_The_neural_processing_of_hierarchical_structure_in_music_and_speech_at_different_timescales
24. The Mind Behind the Music – Number Analytics, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/musicology-meets-cognitive-psychology
25. The Science Behind Music: Understanding the Brain’s Response to Learning an Instrument, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.ossia.edu.sg/blog/the-science-behind-music-understanding-the-brains-response-to-learning-an-instrument
26. Lateral prefrontal cortex is a hub for music production from structural …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/32/18/3878/6489104
27. Cognitive Crescendo: How Music Shapes the Brain’s Structure and …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10605363/
28. TIL that jazz musicians shut off their dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, responsible for self-monitoring performance, and activate their medial prefrontal cortex, which helps with storytelling. This resembles our brain patterns while dreaming. : r/todayilearned – Reddit, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/166bpm2/til_that_jazz_musicians_shut_off_their/
29. Why — and How — Music Moves Us | Pfizer, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/why_and_how_music_moves_us
30. Music and Our Brain – Children’s Music Fund, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.thecmf.org/blogs-and-news/music-and-our-brain/
31. The role of the medial temporal limbic system in processing emotions in voice and music – PubMed, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25291405/
32. Music Stimulates Emotions Through Specific Brain Circuits, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://jonlieffmd.com/blog/music-stimulates-emotions-through-specific-brain-circuits
33. The brain mechanisms behind how we recognise music – Department of Psychiatry, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.psych.ox.ac.uk/news/the-brain-mechanisms-behind-how-we-recognise-music
34. Music and the Brain – Touro Scholar, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://touroscholar.touro.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1210&context=sjlcas
35. When Music and Long-Term Memory Interact: Effects of Musical Expertise on Functional and Structural Plasticity in the Hippocampus – PMC, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2950159/
36. Music and the Brain’s Reward and Bonding Systems | Psychology Today, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/neurosagacity/201604/music-and-the-brains-reward-and-bonding-systems
37. Music and Memory – Arts on the Brain – ScholarBlogs, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://scholarblogs.emory.edu/artsbrain/2020/05/06/music-and-memory/
38. Feel the beat: Music exploits our brain’s ability to predict and the dopamine‐reward system to instill pleasure – EMBO Press, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.embopress.org/doi/10.15252/embr.201743904
39. Rhythmic complexity and predictive coding: a novel approach to modeling rhythm and meter perception in music – PubMed Central, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4181238/
40. Commentary: Predictions and the brain: how musical sounds become rewarding – PMC, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5380745/
41. The sweet spot between predictability and surprise: musical groove in brain, body, and social interactions – Frontiers, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906190/full
42. Interactions Between the Nucleus Accumbens and Auditory Cortices Predict Music Reward Value, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.zlab.mcgill.ca/publications/docs/Science-2013-Salimpoor-216-9.pdf
43. Auditory and reward structures reflect the pleasure of … – Frontiers, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1209398/full
44. Predictive coding in musical anhedonia: A study of groove | PLOS One, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301478
45. Predictability and Uncertainty in the Pleasure of Music: A Reward for …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.jneurosci.org/content/39/47/9397
46. Musical reward prediction errors engage the nucleus accumbens …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1809855116
47. Musical reward prediction errors engage the nucleus accumbens and motivate learning | PNAS, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1809855116
48. Musical surprises light up the brain’s reward center – Futurity, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.futurity.org/music-brains-reward-center-1981262/
49. The Neuroscience of Pleasure: Hacking the Brain’s Reward System – Julie Harris, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://jhwordsmith.medium.com/the-neuroscience-of-pleasure-hacking-the-brains-reward-system-fe0ec6f01432
50. Reward system – Wikipedia, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reward_system
51. Music, emotion and the brain – Music Psychology, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://musicpsychology.co.uk/music-emotion-and-the-brain/
52. How one’s favorite song activates the reward circuitry of the brain: Personality matters! | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51585283_How_one’s_favorite_song_activates_the_reward_circuitry_of_the_brain_Personality_matters
53. Harmonizing Rewards in Music – Number Analytics, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/reward-system-in-music-and-mind
54. Under the Influence: Your Brain on Music – Guitar Tricks Blog, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.guitartricks.com/blog/Under-the-Influence-Your-Brain-on-Music
55. Musical pleasure and musical emotions – PNAS, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1900369116
56. Dopamine modulates the reward experiences elicited by music | PNAS, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1811878116
57. Emotional Responses to Music: Shifts in Frontal Brain Asymmetry Mark Periods of Musical Change – Frontiers, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02044/full
58. From perception to pleasure: Music and its neural substrates – PMC, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3690607/
59. The neurochemistry of music – Alchemy Sky Foundation, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://alchemysky.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Research-v.2.pdf
60. Is music’s effect on dopamine response similar to that of addictive drugs? – Reddit, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/neuroscience/comments/ec00r0/is_musics_effect_on_dopamine_response_similar_to/
61. Music – Neurobiology of Sensation and Reward – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK92781/
62. Brain connectivity reflects human aesthetic responses to music …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/11/6/884/2223400
63. Earworms – Why do Songs Get Stuck in Your Head? – News-Medical.net, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.news-medical.net/health/Earworms-Why-do-Songs-Get-Stuck-in-Your-Head.aspx
64. Your Brain on Music: Earworms – The Kennedy Center, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.kennedy-center.org/education/resources-for-educators/classroom-resources/media-and-interactives/media/music/your-brain-on-music/your-brain-on-music/your-brain-on-music-earworms/
65. Digging Out the “Earworms:” Involuntary Musical Imagery Correlates …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://knowingneurons.com/blog/2016/02/11/earworms/
66. Modelling song popularity as a contagious process – PMC, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8455174/
67. How Music Goes Viral in 2025: The Truth About Influencers & Virality – SpaceLoud, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.spaceloud.com/blog/make-music-go-viral
68. Social complex contagion in music listenership – JOHN TERNOVSKI, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.jter.co/uploads/8/0/0/1/80012994/social_complex_contagion_in_music_listenership.pdf
69. Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks | Management Science – PubsOnLine, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1421
70. Evolutionary origins of music. Classical and recent hypotheses – ResearchGate, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352956044_Evolutionary_origins_of_music_Classical_and_recent_hypotheses
71. What is the evolutionary purpose of music? : r/evolution – Reddit, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/evolution/comments/18kb5d6/what_is_the_evolutionary_purpose_of_music/
72. Evolutionary musicology – Wikipedia, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_musicology
73. Neural dissociation of food- and money-related reward processing …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4526483/
74. The Social Brain and Reward: Social Information Processing in the Human Striatum, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259771505_The_Social_Brain_and_Reward_Social_Information_Processing_in_the_Human_Striatum
75. Common and distinct neural correlates of music and food-induced pleasure: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies | bioRxiv, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.14.250894v1.full-text
76. The Social Brain and Reward: Social Information Processing in the …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3890330/
77. Social Rewards and Social Networks in the Human Brain – ResearchGate, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260374113_Social_Rewards_and_Social_Networks_in_the_Human_Brain
78. Common and distinct neural correlates of music and food-induced …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.14.250894v1.full
79. Addictive potential of social media, explained – Stanford Medicine, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://med.stanford.edu/news/insights/2021/10/addictive-potential-of-social-media-explained.html
80. Scrolling and Stress: The Impact of Social Media on Mental Health – McLean Hospital, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.mcleanhospital.org/essential/social-media
81. Why Social Media Is So Addictive — The Science Behind Dopamine and Reward | by Oseargea | Cognitive NeuroEconomics @ UCSD | Medium, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://medium.com/cognitive-neuroeconomics/why-social-media-is-so-addictive-the-science-behind-dopamine-and-reward-a276d123dc61
82. Neurologic Music Therapy in Neurorehabilitation – Brain Injury …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://biausa.org/public-affairs/media/neurologic-music-therapy-in-neurorehabilitation
83. View of Music Therapy and Neuroscience: Opportunities and Challenges | Voices, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://voices.no/index.php/voices/article/view/2309/2064
84. The Clinical Neuroscience of Music: Evidence Based Approaches and Neurologic Music Therapy | Frontiers Research Topic, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/7579/the-clinical-neuroscience-of-music-evidence-based-approaches-and-neurologic-music-therapy/magazine
85. (PDF) A Case Study in Neuromarketing: Analysis of the Influence of …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331300170_A_Case_Study_in_Neuromarketing_Analysis_of_the_Influence_of_Music_on_Advertising_Effectivenes_through_Eye-Tracking_Facial_Emotion_and_GSR
86. Predictive Coding in Music Perception: Emotional Influences and Therapeutic Implications in Depression – ResearchGate, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391504040_Predictive_Coding_in_Music_Perception_Emotional_Influences_and_Therapeutic_Implications_in_Depression
87. Auditory cortical representation of music favours the perceived beat – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7137933/
88. “When Music Speaks”: Auditory Cortex Morphology as a Neuroanatomical Marker of Language Aptitude and Musicality – Frontiers, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02096/full
89. The Influence of Music on Prefrontal Cortex during Episodic Encoding and Retrieval of Verbal Information: A Multichannel fNIRS Study – PubMed Central, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4609813/
90. Less Effort, Better Results: How Does Music Act on Prefrontal Cortex in Older Adults during Verbal Encoding? An fNIRS Study – Frontiers, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00301/full
91. The Science Of Music: How Sound Affects Our Brain And Emotions – Superlocrian, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://superlocrian.co.uk/2024/08/15/the-science-of-music-how-sound-affects-our-brain-and-emotions/
92. How Music Resonates in the Brain | Harvard Medicine Magazine, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://magazine.hms.harvard.edu/articles/how-music-resonates-brain
93. Feeling the Real World: Limbic Response to Music Depends on …, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article/17/12/2828/378120
94. Good & Bad Sources of Dopamine – Benjo – Medium, accessed on July 13, 2025, https://benjo-li.medium.com/good-bad-sources-of-dopamine-d75492afc8d9